Part 1 covered the comparison of HAWQ versus Hive using Map-Reduce instead of Tez. Now in Part 2, I will execute the same scripts but with Tez enabled.
Enabling Tez is pretty easy to do with HDP 188.8.131.52. You simply change this in the General section under Hive and restart Hive:
hive.execution.engine = tez
Next, I re-ran the same loads and queries. Overall, it is roughly 25% faster with Tez enabled but it is still much slower than HAWQ.
– Loading was slower with Tez enabled but this is probably because I’m testing with a VM.
– Every query was about 40% faster in Hive with Tez versus without.
– HAWQ was about 30 times faster than Hive with Tez and about 57 times faster than Hive with Map-Reduce.
– The execute time reported by Hive was incorrect for each query. For example, I used “time hive -f icd9.sql” to execute a the icd9.sql query and capture the timings. Time reported:
but Hive reported:
Time taken: 13.17 seconds, Fetched: 19 row(s)
So another test but the same result. Hive is much, much slower than HAWQ and even with Tez enabled. If you want Enterprise level SQL for Hadoop, HAWQ is the best solution.